Editorial Reviews
Book Description
If we define the term "constitutional" to mean rules, procedures, or substantive laws fundamental to the republic by way of widespread political agreement or consensus, then what is considered constitutional by way of original text and formal amendment is not necessarily qualitatively superior to that which is considered constitutional merely by way of case law and institutional practices held in place by partisan balances of power. One analytical yardstick for assessing the legitimacy of latter constructs is whether the party or parties responsible for them have made sufficiently successful democratic overtures in the process of pursuing their policy agenda and in securing support for it. In "Constitutional Equilibria," John J. Janssen tests this theory of examining the partisan policy agendas in place early in the history of the republic and examining how partisan realignments have shaped and re-shaped what has amounted to constitutional policy.
About the Author
John J. Janssen is a Senior Associate at Brin & Brin, P.C. in Edinburg, Texas. From 1988 to 1996, Janssen taught government at various Texas universities.
Constitutional Equilibria,John J. Janssen,University Press of America,076181874X,Constitutional history,Constitutional law,General,History & Theory - General,Law,Law and politics,Legal Reference / Law Profession,Political Science,Political aspects,Politics/International Relations,United States,Central government,Constitutional & administrative law,Political Science / History & Theory,USA
English Books:
Recommended Books