Radical Critiques of the Law (AMINTAPHIL)
Editorial Reviews
Book Description
The past two decades have seen an outpouring of work in legal theory that is self-consciously critical of aspects of American law and the institutions of the liberal state. In this lively volume, eminent scholars in philosophy, law, and political science respond to this recent scholarship by exploring what constitutes a "radical" critique of the law, examining such theories as critical legal studies, feminist theory and theories of "difference," and critical race theory.
The authors consider whether the critiques advanced in recent legal theory can truly be called radical and what form a radical critique of American law should take. Writing at the cutting edge of the critique of critical legal theory, they offer insights first on critical legal scholarship, then on feminist political and legal theory. A third group of contributions questions the radicalness of these approaches in light of their failure to challenge fundamental aspects of liberalism, while a final section focuses on current issues of legal reform through critical views on criminal punishment, including observations on rape and hate speech.
Each major essay describes the underlying principles in the development of a radical legal theory and addresses unresolved questions relating to it, while accompanying commentaries present conflicting views. The resulting dialogue explores wide-ranging issues like equity, value relativism, adversarial and empathic legal advocacy, communitarianism and the social contract, impartiality and contingency, "natural" law, and corrective justice. A common thread for many of the articles is a focus on the social dimension of society and law, which finds the individualism of prevailing liberal theories too limiting.
Radical Critiques of the Law is particularly unique in presenting critical and feminist approaches in one volume--along with skeptical commentary about just how radical some critiques really are. Proposing alternative critiques that embody considerably greater promise of being truly radical, it offers provocative reading for both philosophers and legal scholars by showing that many claims to radicalism are highly problematic at best.
From the Back Cover
"This book provides an exceptionally useful introduction to the leading ideas in critical legal studies, feminist legal theory, and critical race theory. It is at least three books in one. Philosophers of law, feminist theorists, and reflective practitioners of the law will find in this powerful anthology the kind of conceptual tools they need to radically deconstruct traditional Anglo-American law."--Rosemarie Tong, author of Feminist Philosophies
"How radical are recent feminist and critical theory critiques of liberal legal theory? This book offers a range of thoughtful assessments. Especially provocative is the section on punishment, challenging not just traditional styles of justification but our very reliance on that institution as an instrument of social control."--Claudia Card, editor of Feminist Ethics
"It is very useful to have in one volume appraisals of law and suggestions for change from these perspectives, especially when accompanied by liberal skepticism about just how radical the critiques really are."--Virginia Held, author of Feminist Morality
"A highly illuminating assessment of some of the most important recent criticisms of the American legal system and the liberalism alleged to justify it."--Carl Wellman, author of Real Rights
Radical Critiques of the Law (AMINTAPHIL)
Radical Critiques of the Law (AMINTAPHIL),International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy,Stephen M. Griffin,Robert C. L. Moffat,University Press of Kansas,0700608451,Congresses,Critical legal studies,Feminist jurisprudence,General,Jurisprudence,Law,Philosophy,Philosophy Of Law,Politics - Current Events,Punishment,Reference
English Books:
Recommended Books